China and the Philippines throw flags at Sandy Cay, Plus China heaves under trade war strain -- China Boss News 5.02.25

Newsletter

What happened?

A sliver of sand has become the newest flashpoint in the South China Sea's long-simmering standoff.

Earlier this month, Chinese coast guard officers landed on Sandy Cay, planted a flag, and declared sovereignty.

Within days, Philippine forces followed suit, hoisting their own flag and triggering an angry response from Beijing, which accused Manila of "illegal boarding."

What later unfolded was a diplomatic photo duel between two countries locked in a territorial tug-of-war—each releasing flag-planting images designed to stake claim and save face.

The skirmish took place under the watchful eyes of US and Philippine troops conducting joint military exercises nearby, adding a layer of strategic suspense to what might otherwise seem like a petty spat over sand.

Sandy Cay - reportedly no larger than a few dozen square meters - lies just miles from Subi Reef, one of China's most fortified artificial islands in the Spratly archipelago.

It may be tiny, but this scrap of sand carries outsized weight in the scramble for the Pacific.

Why it matters

From blip to bastion

To understand how China views Sandy Cay, look no further than its annexed neighbor: Subi Reef.

Once submerged at high tide and barely notable on a maritime chart, Subi Reef is now a linchpin of China's expanding military footprint in the South China Sea.

Here's how - and why - that happened:

1. Location as geostrategic leverage

China selected Subi Reef and Sandy Cay, both nestled in the Spratly Islands, for their greater geostrategic significance.

Subi sits just 25 kilometers from Thitu Island (Pag-asa), a Philippine-held outpost.

Subi's position near key shipping lanes—through which over $3 trillion in global trade flows annually—makes it an ideal staging ground for projecting power and disrupting commerce.

According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), China maintains a network of 20 outposts in the Paracel Islands and 7 in the Spratlys to reinforce its Nine-Dash-Line claims across the South China Sea.

Since 2013, Beijing has undertaken massive dredging operations in the Spratlys, creating over 3,200 acres of artificial land while simultaneously expanding its military footprint in the Paracels.

2. Militarized real estate

China has transformed Subi into a fortress.

Satellite images (seen here; scroll from the bottom up to get a true sense of scale) reveal a 3,000-meter airstrip, missile systems, radar installations, naval docks, underground bunkers, and fuel depots.

As a result, Subi is no longer a disputed reef, but a functioning military base capable of hosting fighter jets, surveilling international waters, and launching rapid-response naval operations across the South China Sea.

3. Engineering the loophole

Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), submerged features like Subi aren't entitled to territorial waters or exclusive economic zones.

But Beijing is attempting to engineer sovereignty over them by linking its claims to artificial platforms, like Subi Reef, to nearby natural features, like Sandy Cay. After that, rinse and repeat.

It's a legal sleight-of-hand: build it, name it, flag it—then claim the rights that follow.

4. Strategic signaling

Subi forms part of China's so-called "strategic triangle" in the Spratlys, alongside Fiery Cross and Mischief Reefs. These '"Big Three" militarized islands serve as forward operating bases that can challenge US naval patrols and intimidate Southeast Asian claimants.

More than that, they test the international community's resolve—especially in the wake of the 2016 Hague tribunal ruling in favor of The Philippines that invalidated China's sweeping maritime claims.

Again, Sandy Cay, tiny as it is, could become the legal linchpin for connecting China's sprawling claims across these artificial platforms.

More troubling still, if Beijing locks down a tiny natural feature like Sandy Cay, it can likely reinforce its legal claim to vast swaths of the South China Sea—including all its oil, gas, and key trade routes.

Yeah, that might get your attention.

Flag waving

China has long recognized the symbolic power of a flag—not as an ornament, but as a strategy.

In contested regions where outright conflict is risky and international law murky, flag-planting becomes a form of silent conquest.

At Woody Island in the Paracels, the flag is hoisted in official ceremonies broadcast nationwide, reinforcing China's grip even as Vietnam maintains its own claims.

At Scarborough Shoal, seized from the Philippines in 2012, flags wave from coast guard ships, fishing boats, and even drones—transforming a shared fishing ground into a stage for maritime brinkmanship.

When Chinese dredgers finished turning Fiery Cross Reef into a military outpost, raising the red banner signaled not just completion but control.

The same symbolism played out during the 2017 Doklam crisis when Chinese troops unfurled the flag on a Himalayan plateau contested by India and Bhutan—an act of psychological warfare as much as territorial assertion.

Even in Antarctica, far from the clamor of regional rivalries, Chinese flags flap outside research stations—soft-power markers of ambition in a land governed by treaty but rich in untapped potential.

Beijing's strategy is clear: China doesn't need to fire a shot to shift boundaries—it just needs a flag, a camera, and the patience to wait while the world hesitates to push back.

But there's still risk of escalation.

What played out on Sandy Cay may look like posturing, but it is calibrated statecraft.

A minor maritime stunt today could become the legal justification for an airstrip or naval blockade tomorrow.

And in this theater, where US forces are training Filipino troops, and Japan is deepening defense ties with Manila, every symbolic gesture carries geopolitical weight.

In sum, the China-Philippines Sandy Cay standoff is another dangerous development in a far bigger game in which the regional - and global - balance of power can be moved grain by grain.

This Week's China News

The Big Story in China Business

CHINA HEAVES UNDER TARIFF STRAIN: China’s economy is wobbling under the weight of Donald Trump’s 145% tariffs.

April’s factory activity shrank at its sharpest pace in 16 months.

Export orders are falling to pandemic-era lows. Layoffs are spreading.

Beijing is working overtime to prevent a broader unraveling. China, we are told, can weather the storm.

Sandbagging: A $41 billion domestic demand push is underway, and targeted stimulus is trickling into the economy.

State media is pumping out slick videos portraying China as the righteous anti-bully standing tall against American coercion.

Yet behind the bravado, cracks are widening.

Trump’s tariffs hit China where it still hurts—exports.

Manufacturing remains a critical pillar of growth, and roughly 16 million Chinese jobs are tied to shipments to the US.

Where it hurts: Sectors like electronics, apparel, and chemicals are feeling the pressure first. Some factories are cutting shifts; others are closing down entirely.

Youth unemployment, already above 16%, is rising as a record number of college grads prepare to enter a worsening job market.

China’s traditional growth engines—property and consumption—are also misfiring.

Xi’s government can’t simply flip a switch from exports to internal demand. So it’s improvising: subsidies for hiring, consumer discounts, vocational retraining, and the quiet hint of rate cuts.

A broader stimulus remains possible, but Beijing continues to tread carefully, wary of stoking another debt bubble.

Trade talks frozen: Publicly, China rejects the idea of negotiating with Washington. But the stance is softening around the edges.

Exemptions are quietly being granted for semiconductors and critical goods. State-linked social media accounts now murmur that “dialogue isn’t defeat.” Treasury officials admit to informal contacts, even if formal talks remain frozen.

Meanwhile, Xi is banking on resilience.

Since 2018, China has diversified its trade ties. Today, over 145 countries trade more with China than the US.

Some of the manufacturing pain is being rerouted to Southeast Asia. But that, too, brings risks—of oversupply, dumping, and regional backlash.

China is also fighting the trade war on the propaganda front, portraying Trump’s tariffs as desperate acts of American decline.

But Beijing’s own track record of economic retaliation—against countries like Australia and Lithuania—undercuts its appeal as a champion of fair trade.

The China Boss rundown: Xi's deeper challenge isn’t the tariffs but the fraying of China’s social contract.

For years, the Party’s promise was growth in exchange for control. But slower growth, rising disillusionment, and youth anxiety are weakening that bargain.

Xi believes China can outlast the US in this economic standoff—and come out more resilient, diversified, and globally ascendant. But the longer this drags on, the more both sides bleed.

What’s at stake for China if tariffs persist:

Short Term (0–6 months):

China’s export sector takes an immediate hit—factories pause production, up to 16 million jobs are at risk, and youth unemployment worsens.

Consumer confidence remains fragile due to the housing slump and job insecurity, undermining efforts to boost domestic demand.

Foreign firms face “double tariffs,” accelerating relocations out of China. Social discontent simmers, with localized protests over layoffs and stalled wages.

Medium Term (6–18 months):

Manufacturing relocations and trade rerouting become entrenched, weakening China’s dominance in global supply chains.

Export losses outpace gains from stimulus.

Southeast Asia may face friction from dumped Chinese goods.

Xi’s high-tech modernization goals slow due to restricted access to US inputs.

The mismatch between state messaging and economic reality could erode public trust.

Long Term (18+ months):

Sustained tariffs stall China's economic rebalancing.

Global perception shifts: Beijing’s image as a reliable trade partner suffers, and its geopolitical clout weakens.

Domestically, Xi’s “rejuvenation” narrative risks losing credibility, creating long-term political and economic strain.

The final tally: No, China’s economy won’t break—true economic collapse requires a fundamental breakdown in governance, not just financial strain or slowing growth. If signs of the latter begins to show, then I’ll readjust this outlook.

But the longer the tariffs continue, the more damage they will inflict and the further Xi drifts from his legacy of national rejuvenation.

Law and International Xi

JACK MA INVOLVED IN CHINESE TRANSNATIONAL REPRESSION CASE: In a stunning twist, Alibaba founder Jack Ma has been implicated in a Chinese transnational repression campaign.